The Korea Society Of Educational Studies In Mathematics
[ Article ]
Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics - Vol. 30, No. 4, pp.751-772
ISSN: 2288-7733 (Print) 2288-8357 (Online)
Print publication date 30 Nov 2020
Received 10 Oct 2020 Revised 05 Nov 2020 Accepted 14 Nov 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29275/jerm.2020.11.30.4.751

How Do Prospective Elementary School Teachers Respond to Students’ Mathematical Thinking?

Sunwoo, Jin* ; Pang, JeongSuk**,
*Teacher, YoungDuk Elementary School, South Korea camy17@naver.com
**Professor, Korea National University of Education, South Korea jeongsuk@knue.ac.kr

Correspondence to: Professor, Korea National University of Education, South Korea, jeongsuk@knue.ac.kr

Abstract

Although the ability to respond to students’ mathematical thinking is important among teachers’ professional noticing, there has been a lack of research investigating such ability among Korean teachers. This study surveyed 95 prospective elementary school teachers with an aim to investigate their responding ability with five sub-components. A written assessment for this study was developed on the basis of students’ solution strategies regarding four operations (addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division) of whole numbers. The results of this study showed that many teachers were able to identify the core mathematical elements in the student's strategy, interpret the student's strategy by using mathematical concepts and terms, and suggest an appropriate teaching method. However, some prospective teachers tended to pose inappropriate problems or provide superficial teaching methods in response to the student’s mathematical thinking. It was unusual for them to anticipate the student's future strategies. Based on the obtained results, this study is expected to suggest the aspects that are further needed for prospective teachers to promote their ability to respond to students’ mathematical thinking.

Keywords:

prospective elementary school teacher, responding to students’ mathematical thinking, professional noticing

References

  • Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554]
  • Barnhart, T., & van Es, E. (2015). Studying teacher noticing: Examining the relationship among pre-service science teachers’ ability to attend, analyze and respond to student thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 83-93. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.09.005]
  • Casey, S., Lesseig, K., Monson, D., & Krupa, E. E. (2018). Examining preservice secondary mathematics teachers’ responses to student work to solve linear equations. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 20(1), 132-153.
  • Ding, L., & Domínguez, H. (2016). Opportunities to notice: Chinese prospective teachers noticing students’ ideas in a distance formula lesson. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19(4), 325-347. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-015-9301-3]
  • Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L. C., & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children’s mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(2), 169-202. [https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.41.2.0169]
  • Kim, H. J., Han, C., Bae, M. S., & Kwon, O. N. (2017). The relationship between mathematics teachers’ noticing and responsive teaching: In the context of teaching for all students’ mathematical thinking. The Mathematical Education, 56(3), 341-363.
  • Lampert, M., Franke, M. L., Kazemi, E., Ghousseini, H., Turrou, A. C., Beasley, H., ... & Crowe, K. (2013). Keeping it complex: Using rehearsals to support novice teacher learning of ambitious teaching. Journal of teacher education, 64(3), 226-243. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487112473837]
  • Land, T. J., Tyminski, A. M., & Drake, C. (2019). Examining aspects of teachers’ posing of problems in response to children’s mathematical thinking. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 22(4), 331-353. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-018-9418-2]
  • Lee, E. J. & Lee, K. H. (2016). A study on teacher’s pre-noticing and actual noticing in mathematics classroom. School Mathematics, 18(4), 773-791.
  • Lee, E. J. & Park, M. M. (2018). Exploring prospective elementary teachers’ ability to notice. The Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 28(4), 417-435. [https://doi.org/10.29275/jerm.2018.11.28.4.417]
  • Lee, Y. M. & Lee, S. J. (2018). Prospective secondary mathematics teachers’ noticing in lesson evaluation and lesson reflection. School Mathematics, 20(1), 185-207. [https://doi.org/10.29275/sm.2018.03.20.1.185]
  • Ministry of Education (2020). Elementary mathematics 3-2 teachers’ lesson guide. Seoul: Chunjae Education.
  • Monson, D., Krupa, E., Lesseig, K., & Casey, S. (2020). Developing secondary prospective teachers’ ability to respond to student work. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 23(2), 209-232. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-018-9420-8]
  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston, VA: Author.
  • Reys, R. E., Lindquist, M. M., Lambdin, D. V., & Smith, N. L. (2017). Helping children learn mathematics (11th Ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Son, J. W. (2016). Preservice teachers’ response and feedback type to correct and incorrect student-invented strategies for subtracting whole numbers. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 42, 49-68. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2016.02.003]
  • Sunwoo, J. & Pang, J. S. (2020). A study on the responsive teaching practices of an elementary school teacher teaching pattern generalization. School Mathematics, 22(2), 449 -469. [https://doi.org/10.29275/sm.2020.06.22.2.445]