The Korea Society Of Educational Studies In Mathematics
[ Article ]
Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics - Vol. 30, No. 4, pp.773-796
ISSN: 2288-7733 (Print) 2288-8357 (Online)
Print publication date 30 Nov 2020
Received 10 Oct 2020 Revised 13 Nov 2020 Accepted 18 Nov 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29275/jerm.2020.11.30.4.773

Investigating the Possibility of Performing Algebraic Generalization Based on the Analysis of Problem Solving on Near/Far Generalization of 6th Graders

Lim, Miin* ; Chang, Hyewon**,
*Teacher, Seoul Kaemyong Elementary School, South Korea ssbin22@sen.go.kr
**Professor, Seoul National University of Education, South Korea hwchang@snue.ac.kr

Correspondence to: Professor, Seoul National University of Education, South Korea, hwchang@snue.ac.kr

Abstract

Students who have learned arithmetic in elementary mathematics would learn algebra in middle schools in earnest. So, the transition from arithmetical thinking to algebraic thinking is an important success factor for algebra learning. Therefore, in this study, 64 sixth graders solved the problems of near generalization and far generalization concerning the generalization of some figure patterns. Subsequently we analyzed their problem solving. As a result of the analysis, several cases of students having difficulties in performing algebraic generalization were identified. Through the discussion of the research results, several pedagogical implications were drawn to support the transition from arithmetical thinking to algebraic thinking in elementary school students.

Keywords:

arithmetical generalization, algebraic generalization, near generalization, far generalization, early algebra

References

  • Amit, M., & Neria, D. (2008). Rising to the challenge : using generalization in pattern problems to unearth the algebraic skills of talented pre-algebra students. ZDM, 40(1), 111-129. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0069-5]
  • Billings, E. (2008). Exploring generalization through pictorial growth patterns. Algebra and algebraic thinking in school mathematics (pp. 279-293). VA: NCTM.
  • Bishop, J. (2000). Linear geometric number patterns: middle school students’ strategies. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 12(2), 107-126. [https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217079]
  • Choi, I. (2020). A study on the pattern generalization process through the figural pattern learning environment : focusing on eye-tracking analysis and a microworld. Doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University.
  • Dretske, F. (1990). Seeing, believing, and knowing. Visual cognition and action (pp. 129-148). MIT Press.
  • Dreyfus, T. (1991). Advanced mathematical thinking processes. Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 25-41). Springer, Dordrecht. [https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47203-1_2]
  • Ellis, A. B. (2007). A taxonomy for categorizing generalizations : generalizing actions and reflection generalizations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(2), 221-262. [https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400701193705]
  • Filloy, E., & Rojano, T. (1989). Solving equations: the transition from arithmetic to algebra. For the Learning of Mathematics, 9(2), 19-26.
  • Herscovics, N., & Linchevski, L. (1994). A cognitive gap between arithmetic and algebra. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27(1), 59-78. [https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01284528]
  • Kim, N. (1994). Considerations on algebraic thinking : arithmetic connection and variable concept. Journal of the Korea Society of Educational Studies in Mathematics, 4(2), 189-204.
  • Kim, N. (1997). Understanding of the meaning and the construction of generalization. The Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 7(1), 445-458.
  • Kim, S. (2002). On the transfer in mathematics learning -focusing on arithmetic and algebra-. The Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 12(1), 29-48.
  • Kim, S. (2003). A study on elementary school algebra -focusing on ‘early algebra’-. The Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 13(3), 309-327.
  • Kim, S. (2004). Analysis of the algebraic thinking factors and search for the direction of its learning and teaching. Doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University.
  • Krutet︠s︡kiĭ, V. A., Wirszup, I., & Kilpatrick, J. (1976). Psychology of mathematical abilities in schoolchildren. Chicago: University of Chicago.
  • Lee, L., & Freiman, V. (2006). Developing algebraic thinking through pattern exploration. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 11(9), 428-433.
  • Ministry of Education (2019a). Elementary mathematics textbook 4-1. Seoul: Chunjae Education.
  • Ministry of Education (2019b). Elementary mathematics teacher’s guidebook 4-1. Seoul: Chunjae Education.
  • Ministry of Education (2020). Elementary mathematics textbook 2-2. Seoul: Visang.
  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. VA: NCTM.
  • Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it: a new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton University Press.
  • Radford, L. (2008). Iconicity and contraction: a semiotic investigation of forms of algebraic generalizations of patterns in different contexts. ZDM, 40(1), 83-96. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0061-0]
  • Rivera, F. (2013). Teaching and learning patterns in school mathematics : psychological and pedagogical considerations. NY: Springer. [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2712-0]
  • Rivera, F., & Becker, J. R. (2011). Formation of pattern generalization involving linear figural patterns among middle school students : results of a three-year study. Early algebraization (pp. 323-366). Berlin: Springer. [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17735-4_18]
  • Stacey, K. (1989). Finding and using patterns in linear generalising problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 20(2), 147-164. [https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00579460]
  • Warren, E. (2003). The role of arithmetic structure in the transition from arithmetic to algebra. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 15(2), 122-137. [https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217374]
  • Warren, E., & Cooper, T. (2008). Generalising the pattern rule for visual growth patterns : actions that support 8 year olds’ thinking. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(2), 171-185. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-007-9092-2]
  • Watson, A., & Mason, J. (2006). Mathematics as a constructive activity. [https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410613714]
  • Yu, M., & Ryu, S. (2013). A comparison between methods of generalization according to the types of pattern of mathematically gifted students and non-gifted students in elementary school. School Mathematics, 15(2), 459-479.